🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.